Subconjunctival liposomal sirolimus vs. cyclosporine or tacrolimus as treatment of keratoconjunctivitis sicca in dogs: A double-blind, randomized study.

PURPOSE: To compare the safety and efficacy of a 100 microgram subconjunctival injection of liposome-encapsulated sirolimus (SCJS) to cyclosporine (CsA) or tacrolimus (CsA/T) for the treatment of keratoconjunctivitis sicca (KCS) in dogs. METHODS: Dogs with signs and symptoms of KCS were block-randomized to one of two treatment groups: Biweekly SCJS or conventional treatment (CsA/T). Schirmer tear test 1 (STT-1) scores, conjunctival hyperemia (CH) scores, corneal opacity (CO) scores, and clinical evaluation of potential side effects were recorded every 2 weeks for 14 weeks for both groups. Differences between groups were analyzed using the mixed results ANOVA and U-Mann Whitney tests (p < .05 was considered significant). RESULTS: A total of 30 eyes were included in the study, of which 20 eyes completed follow-up. There was no statistically significant interaction between the treatment group and time on STT-1 score (p = .165), and median CH and CO scores showed no statistically significant differences between groups (p = .353 and p = .393, respectively). There were no clinically significant side effects present in any subject at any time. CONCLUSION: In this trial, a 1 mg/mL (100 micrograms) SCJS every 2 weeks showed similar safety and efficacy profiles as daily CsA/T in dogs with KS after 14 weeks of treatment. Larger studies should be performed to further assess SCJS as an alternative treatment for KCS.

Subconjunctival Sirolimus-Loaded Liposomes for the Treatment of Moderate-to-Severe Dry Eye Disease.

Purpose: To determine the effectiveness of subconjunctival application of a novel sirolimus liposomal formulation for the treatment of dry eye. Methods: A randomized, triple-blind, Phase II clinical trial. Thirty-eight eyes of 19 patients were included. Nine patients (18 eyes) assigned to the sham group (Sham) and 10 patients (20 eyes) to sirolimus-loaded liposomes group (Sirolimus). The treatment group received three doses of subconjunctival liposome-encapsulated sirolimus and the sham group received three doses of liposomal suspension without sirolimus. Subjective (Ocular Surface Disease Index, OSDI) and measured (corrected distance visual acuity, conjunctival hyperemia, tear osmolarity, Schirmer's test, corneal/conjunctival staining and matrix metalloproteinase-9) variables were measured. Results: Sirolimus-entrapped liposomes-treated group OSDI scores changed from 62.19 (± 6.07) to 37.8 (± 17.81) (p=0.0024), and conjunctival hyperemia from 2.0 (± 0.68) to 0.83 (± 0.61) (p<0.0001); Sham group with OSDI scores from 60.02 (± 14.2) to 36.02 (± 20.70) (p=0.01), and conjunctival hyperemia from 1.33 (± 0.68) to 0.94 (± 0.87) (p=0.048). All the other evaluated outcomes only showed significant differences in the sirolimus group: corneal/conjunctival staining score (p=0.0015), lipid layer interferometry (p=0.006), and inferior meibomian gland dropout (p=0.038). No local or systemic adverse effects regarding the medication itself were reported, and the administration route was well accepted. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that sub-conjunctival sirolimus-loaded liposomes are effective in reducing both signs and symptoms of dry eye in patients with poorly controlled moderate-to-severe DED, while avoiding other topical administration adverse effects. Further investigation with a larger sample size is required to determine long-term effects.

Disseminated idiopathic lipid keratopathy in a normolipemic cat.

OBJECTIVE: To report a case of idiopathic lipid keratopathy in a normolipemic cat. ANIMAL STUDIED: A 10-year-old neutered female European domestic cat. RESULTS: A cat was evaluated for bilateral white corneal deposits. Slit-lamp examination revealed multiple, well-defined, round, stromal, cream-colored deposits of different sizes associated with generalized superficial corneal vascularization. Blood lipids were normal, and no history of travel to tropical locations or ocular trauma was present. Topical betamethasone/gentamicin 0.1% suspension q 12 hours did not result in any improvement of clinical appearance after one week. Tomography following the initial therapy revealed dense, hyperreflective deposits with posterior shadowing in the anterior and mid stroma of both corneas. A four-week course of itraconazole 0.01% ophthalmic cream was prescribed q 12 hours with no improvement. Four months after the initial examination, a diagnostic superficial keratectomy and amniotic membrane implantation were performed. Histopathological analysis showed membrane bound vacuoles with infiltration of foamy macrophages suggesting a diagnosis of primary lipidosis. The post-surgical period was unremarkable, and ten days later, the patient was re-examined. Opacification from a corneal leukoma was observed in the excision site with mild fibrotic tissue. Two months post-keratectomy, no further changes were detected in the cornea, and the patient was managed only with topical lubricant. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first report of idiopathic corneal lipidosis in a cat and may be considered as a differential diagnosis of corneal disease in felines.

Pharmacokinetics of Sirolimus in a Novel Liposome Delivery System in Selected Ocular Tissues and Plasma Following a Single Subconjunctival Injection in Dutch Belted Rabbits.

Purpose: To determine the pharmacokinetics of a proprietary liposomal sirolimus (LS) formulation in ocular tissues and plasma following a single subconjunctival (SCJ) injection in Dutch belted rabbits (DBR). Analytical methods for detection of LS in plasma, aqueous humor (AH), vitreous humor (VH), retina, combined retina/choroid/retinal pigment epithelium, sclera, and iris/ciliary body were developed to examine samples. Methods: Thirty male DBR were subconjunctivally injected in both eyes with 0.1 mL of LS of 1,000 µg/mL. At selected times post-injection, ocular tissues and whole blood samples were obtained. Sirolimus concentrations were measured using liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry. Results: No LS was detected in serum or AH at any time. All other examined ocular tissues had quantifiable amounts of LS at all times. LS levels were highest in sclera and lowest in VH, suggesting LS followed the supraciliary and suprachoroidal spaces to reach the posterior segment. Vitreous peak of sirolimus levels occurred at 2 h, and the sclera adjacent to the injection peaked at both 2 and 96 h. LS levels in remaining ocular tissues peaked at 6 h and decreased with time, persisting at presumed therapeutic levels on day 22. Conclusions: LS can quickly diffuse into posterior intraocular tissues after SCJ injection without reaching quantifiable levels in AH or serum in DBR. Peak levels occurred in posterior intraocular tissues at 6 h and persisted in all tissues after 3 weeks. SCJ LS in DBR is safe, has a stable pharmacokinetic profile, and should be considered for further study in human trials for autoimmune ophthalmopathies.

Correlation of Complement Activation in Aqueous and Vitreous in Patients With Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy.

Purpose: A growing body of evidence suggests complement dysregulation is present in the vitreous of patients with diabetic eye disease. Further translational study could be simplified if aqueous-as opposed to vitreous-were used to sample the intraocular complement environment. Here, we analyze aqueous samples and assess whether a correlation exists between aqueous and vitreous complement levels. Methods: We collected aqueous, vitreous, and plasma samples from patients with and without proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) undergoing vitrectomy. We assessed correlation between complement levels in aqueous and vitreous samples after using a normalizing ratio to correct for vascular leakage. Spearman correlation coefficients were used to assess the correlation between complement levels in the aqueous and vitreous. Results: Aqueous samples were obtained from 17 cases with PDR and 28 controls. In all patients, aqueous Ba, C3a, and albumin levels were strongly correlated with vitreous levels (Spearman correlation coefficient of 0.8 for Ba and C3a and 0.7 for albumin; all P values < 0.0001). In PDR eyes only, aqueous and vitreous C3a levels were significantly correlated (Spearman correlation coefficient 0.7; P = 0.002), whereas in control eyes, both Ba and C3a (Spearman correlation coefficients of 0.7; P < 0.0001) were significantly correlated. Conclusions: A strong correlation exists between aqueous and vitreous complement levels in diabetic eye disease. Translational Relevance: The results establish that accurate sampling of the intraocular complement can be done by analyzing aqueous specimens, allowing for the rapid and safe measurement of experimental complement targets and treatment response.

Toxicity Evaluation of a Novel Rapamycin Liposomal Formulation After Subconjunctival and Intravitreal Injection.

Purpose: Safety and toxicity evaluation of a novel, liposome-encapsulated rapamycin formulation, intended for autoimmune ocular disorders. Methods: The formulation was assessed by micronucleus polychromatic erythrocyte production, irritability by Hen's Egg Test-Chorioallantoic Membrane (HET CAM), sterility, and pyrogenicity testing. Subconjunctival (SCJ) and intravitreal (IVT) administration of the formulation were performed to evaluate subacute and acute toxicity, respectively. Differences between groups in biochemical and hematological parameters were evaluated by analysis of variance and t-tests. Numeric score was assigned to histopathological classification. Electroretinography (ERG) testing was also performed. Data were analyzed by a 1 way no parametric Kruskal-Wallis and the Mann-Whitney tests. Significance was considered when P < 0.05. Results: No significant toxicity directly related to the preparation was detected. Micronucleus count, mucous irritation score, and pyrogenicity results were negative. Pathology demonstrated no damage related to the formulation after SCJ injection. After IVT injection, only lens injury associated with technique was observed. Retinal function was also conserved in ERG. Conclusions: The preparation evaluated offers a good toxicity and safety profile when injected in a SCJ or IVT manner in an animal model. A clinical trial conducted in humans is highly warranted, as it could reveal an alternative immunosuppressive treatment for ophthalmological immune-mediated pathologies.

Intravitreal bromfenac liposomal suspension (100 µg / 0.1 ml). A safety study in rabbit eyes.

INTRODUCTION: There is a need to find alternative treatments for MEe. Bromfenac has shown promise in inhibiting the COX-2 enzymatic pathway that partially causes the inflammatory cascade which contributes to the precipitation of ME. However, like other NSAID's, its intraocular half-life is limited. We hypothesize that a delayed-release liposome formulation containing bromfenac might provide a similar anti-inflammatory effect as long-lasting steroid release systems without the well-known steroidal side-effects. We introduced a novel formulation with these characteristics into the vitreous cavity of rabbit eyes in order to evaluate its safety profile. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 10 left eyes of rabbits were injected with the liposome-encapsulated bromfenac suspension (100 µg/0.1 ml). Basal ERG's were recorded. Total follow-up time was 3 months, at which point ERG's were repeated and eyes were enucleated for histopathological study. Total amplitude and implicit times were recorded. A difference of 25% in either recording was considered significant. Significance was assessed using the paired-t test and Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test. A p-value of <0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: No significant changes were recorded in ERG measurements after 3 months when compared to basal measurements. Histopathological analysis of retinal specimens found no traces of liposome-induced toxicity. CONCLUSION: The liposome-encapsulated bromfenac suspension (100 µg/0.1 ml) is not toxic and has been proven safe to use in an animal model. Therefore, this formulation shows promise as a possible future alternative treatment for ME and should be further studied to show its biological effect and efficacy.

Risk of Pneumonitis with the Use of Different Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in a Mexican Population.

PURPOSE: The incidence of pneumonitis reported in previous trials in patients with advanced cancer and use of programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) immunotherapy inhibitors was 2.7-3.6%. However, none of these trials included Mexican populations. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis involving 87 patients with advanced cancer who received PD-1 inhibitors as part of their therapy. The primary outcome was the incidence of pneumonitis after using PD-1 inhibitors. The secondary outcomes were major risk factors and radiological patterns of pneumonitis. RESULTS: We found 13 cases of pneumonitis, giving an overall incidence of 15%; three of the cases were high-grade (grade 3). A ground-glass pattern was the major form found by chest computed tomography scans. We did not find any significant risk factor for pneumonitis. CONCLUSION: The incidence of pneumonitis secondary to treatment with PD-1 inhibitors in our Mexican population was 15%, which is 5 times higher than that found in other studies. No risk factor was identified for this increased incidence of drug-induced pneumonitis following the use of PD-1 inhibitors.